NB Studios  /  Blog  /  My Editing Rig
The Setup

My editing rig in 2026 — and why hardware is a business decision, not a hobby

A list of parts is a boring post and a useless one, because the real question was never what I own. It is how you decide what to buy next when money is finite — which is where almost every freelance editor actually lives. So this is the rig, and it is also the reasoning.

The short version
  • Hardware is a cost-per-hour calculation, not a spec contest. Buy against the bottleneck you actually hit.
  • Storage first, display second, machine third. Most editors get this order backwards and buy the CPU first.
  • The reference monitor changed my colour work more than any other purchase — it turns grading from a guess into a measurement.
  • The keyboard is a comfort purchase and I am not going to pretend otherwise. It belongs last on the list.
  • Every piece here is on my desk earning money on client work. Nothing on this page is here because a brand sent it.
Affiliate disclosure Some links below are affiliate links. If you buy through them I earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. I paid for every item on this page myself, and I have kept the parts that would stop me recommending something — including the bit where I tell you the keyboard will not make you a faster editor.
2Machines, one desk, one bag
3Displays, only one I trust for colour
10 yrsIn post-production
0Items on this page sent by a brand
Nico Babierra's editing desk: dual monitors running Adobe Premiere on a Darwin Property Group real estate edit, Mac mini, M-Audio monitors and a mechanical keyboard
The main desk in Manila, mid-job on a Darwin Property Group property film. Nothing here is aspirational — it is what a working week looks like. (The agent's contact details are blurred; they belong to the client, not to this post.)

I have been asked about my setup enough times that it is easier to write it down. But a list of parts is a boring post and, worse, a useless one — because the interesting question was never what do you own. It is how do you decide what to buy next when money is finite, which is the position almost every freelance editor is actually in.

So this is the rig, and it is also the reasoning. Where I think a purchase was obviously right, I say so. Where I think I bought something because I wanted it rather than because I needed it, I say that too.

Why kit is a business decision, not a hobby

Here is the shift that changed how I buy things. Stop asking “can I afford this?” and start asking “how many hours a year does this give back, and what is an hour of my time worth?”

An editor billing client work has a real hourly rate, even if they have never written it down. If a purchase removes two hours a week of waiting, that is roughly a hundred hours a year. Put your own rate against that number and most sensible upgrades stop looking like spending and start looking like buying back time.

But — and this is where most gear advice fails — that logic only holds if the thing you buy addresses the bottleneck you actually hit. A faster processor does nothing if your real bottleneck is waiting on a slow drive, or redoing a grade because you could not trust your screen. Buying against the spec sheet instead of against your own week is how people end up with a fast machine and the same working day.

The test I use before buying anything

Think back over the last five jobs and name the moment you were waiting or redoing. Not the moment something felt slow — the moment work actually stopped. Whatever caused that is your bottleneck, and it is almost never the thing the marketing is selling you. Mine, for two years, was drive speed on ingest. It was not the CPU.

The machines — desk and bag

Two machines, doing two genuinely different jobs. If I had to keep one, it would be the desktop, and it is not close.

A Mac mini M4 Pro on a desk with a UGREEN dock stacked underneath it, beside a Keychron keyboard
Main workstation

Mac mini M4 Pro

The most editing performance per peso I have ever bought, for one boring reason: you are not paying for a screen, a battery or a chassis. It sits under the monitors, it is silent, and it handles multicam property edits and long-form dubbing timelines without drama. If you work at a desk most days, this is the machine to buy before you consider a laptop.

Apple siliconDesk-boundSilent under load
I don't have an affiliate link for this one — buy it wherever it's cheapest.
Apple MacBook Pro
Mobile workstation

MacBook Pro (M5 Pro)

This earns its place the moment work happens away from the desk — on location, at a client's office, or in an airport. It is a luxury right up until the day it isn't, and then it is the reason a deadline gets met. If your work is entirely desk-based, skip it and put the money into storage and a display.

TravelsFull edit + gradeBattery-critical work
A MacBook Pro running an edit on an outdoor cafe table by the river in Bangkok, with breakfast beside it
Bangkok, cutting before the day started. This is the only argument for a laptop that matters — not that it is powerful, but that the work travelled with me and the client never knew.

What you look at, and the one screen I trust

Here is the thing nobody tells you early enough: every colour decision you make is only as good as the screen you made it on. You can own the fastest machine in the country and still deliver a grade that falls apart on the client's laptop, because your display was quietly lying to you the whole time.

I run three screens, and they do three different jobs.

Lenovo Legion R27q-30 monitor
Primary display

Lenovo Legion R27q-30

1440p at 27 inches is, for my money, the sweet spot for an edit bay — enough panel to keep a timeline, a program monitor and an inspector visible at once without the scaling headaches of 4K. This is a working display, not a grading display, and I am careful not to confuse the two.

27″ 1440pTimeline + panelsWorking display

The one that actually changed my work

A BON BPM-170L multi-format broadcast monitor, fed from the timeline. It is the least glamorous object on my desk and the one I would replace first if it died.

The reason is simple. On a normal display you are grading against an unknown — you make a call, you deliver, and the client's screen is the first honest test of whether you were right. A reference monitor moves that test to your desk, before the file goes out. Your scopes and your eyes finally agree with each other.

Where the colour loop closes
WITHOUT A REFERENCE · THE LOOP CLOSES TOO LATE Camera log footage Uncalibrated display you are grading on a guess The client’s screen first honest test · revision round WITH A REFERENCE · THE LOOP CLOSES AT THE DESK Camera log footage Reference monitor known standard · scopes agree The client’s screen confirms what you already knew
Without a reference, the first honest test of your grade happens on the client's screen — which is to say, during a revision round. A reference monitor moves that test to your desk, which is the whole value: not prettier images, fewer arguments.
An editing display running Adobe Premiere beside a multi-format broadcast reference monitor showing the same frame
The same frame on both screens. When they disagree, the reference monitor is right and I am wrong — that is the entire point of owning one.
A BON BPM-170L multi-format broadcast monitor on a desk
The BON BPM-170L. Bought used, unglamorous, and the best money I have spent on picture quality.
DaVinci Resolve colour page with curves and colour wheels on the main display, and parade and vectorscope on the second monitor
Scopes get their own screen. Parade and vectorscope live on the second monitor so I am never covering the picture to check the picture.

Storage, and the mistake that actually costs money

If you take one thing from this post, take this: a slow machine costs you hours, but lost footage costs you the job, the client, and every referral that client would have sent. Storage is the only category where the downside is not inconvenience, it is your reputation.

It is also, unglamorously, where I found my real bottleneck. For two years I thought I needed a faster computer. I needed faster drives.

Samsung 9100 PRO PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD
Internal / working storage

Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB (PCIe 5.0 NVMe)

Working media lives here. The jump you feel is not in export times — it is in ingest, cache and scrubbing a heavy multicam timeline, which is where the waiting actually happens in a normal day. This is the upgrade I should have made two years before I did.

PCIe 5.0 ×42TBWorking media
A Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD box held in hand at a computer shop, with a 990 PRO box behind it
Picking it up in person. The 990 PRO behind it is still an excellent drive and considerably cheaper — if your bottleneck is a spinning disk, either one solves your problem.
Samsung T9 portable SSD
Field & delivery storage

Samsung T9 Portable SSD

This is the drive that goes in the bag. Shoots come home on it, client deliverables go out on it, and it is fast enough to cut directly off it when I am working away from the desk. If you are choosing between an internal upgrade and a good portable, and you shoot as well as edit, buy the portable first.

PortableEdit off it directlyField ingest
Fast storage is not backup

Two of these drives is not a backup strategy, it is two things that can fail. Three copies, two different media, one off-site — boring, decades old, still correct. The cheapest insurance in this entire post is a second copy of the footage you cannot reshoot, and it costs less than the keyboard.

The desk stuff that only matters after the rest

Everything from here down is comfort and convenience. Genuinely useful, and genuinely last in line. Do not buy any of it before the storage and the display are sorted.

UGREEN dock for Mac mini
Connectivity

UGREEN dock for Mac mini

The Mac mini's port situation is fine until you have two displays, three drives and an audio interface, at which point it is not. This is the slab sitting directly under the mini in the photo further up — it turns a daily cable dance into one cable. Pure quality-of-life — it makes nothing faster, it just stops the day being annoying.

Hub + SSD enclosureSits under the miniOne-cable desk
Keychron K5 Max full size wireless mechanical keyboard
Input

Keychron K5 Max

Let me be straight with you: this will not make you a faster editor. Not one frame. I bought it because my hands are on a keyboard eight hours a day and I wanted those eight hours to be pleasant, and by that standard it was worth every peso. The full-size layout matters more than the switches — the number pad is genuinely useful for timecode entry. Buy it as the comfort purchase it is, after the things that affect your output.

Full sizeLow profileWireless
A Keychron K5 Max full size wireless mechanical keyboard box on a retail shelf
Bought in a shop, after typing on it. With a keyboard that is worth doing — the spec sheet tells you nothing about whether you will like it.

Monitoring: M-Audio nearfields

An M-Audio powered nearfield monitor on the desk beside the display, power LED lit
Monitoring

M-Audio nearfield monitors

Audio is half of what your client experiences, and it is where amateur work gives itself away fastest — a muddy mix reads as cheap long before a soft grade does. Here is the part nobody selling speakers will tell you: you do not need expensive monitors. You need monitors instead of laptop speakers, and then you need to learn how a good mix sounds on the pair you already own. A cheap pair you know well beats an expensive pair you don't.

Powered nearfieldsOne either sideMix reference
Check price →Mine are an older model — any honest nearfield beats laptop speakers.
A dense multi-layer Premiere timeline for an ABS-CBN Big Dipper broadcast project
A broadcast timeline on a normal day. This is the load the machine is actually bought for — not a benchmark, a real sequence with dozens of layers that has to scrub without stuttering while someone waits on it.

Software: where the money goes now

This is the part of the post that has changed most in the last twelve months, and it deserves its own thought.

All three major NLEs shipped a major release inside eight days this September, and they now price fundamentally differently: DaVinci Resolve is $295 once, Media Composer is a subscription, and Adobe Premiere is a subscription plus per-generation AI credits. That last one is new, and it changes the maths — software used to be a fixed annual cost you could quote against. For AI-heavy work, it is now a variable one.

I run all three, because my ABS-CBN work and my freelance work do not use the same tools. If you are choosing, I wrote the whole comparison up separately:

The software point most gear posts miss

A $295 one-time licence for Resolve costs less than most single hardware upgrades in this post, and it will do more for your output than any of them if colour is where your work is weak. Software is usually the cheapest capability you can buy — people default to hardware because hardware is more fun to own.

What I’d buy first on a limited budget

If someone starting out asked me to spend their money for them, this is the order, and it is deliberately not the order most people buy in.

01
A backup you actually trust
Not fast storage — a second copy. Three copies, two media, one off-site. This is the only item on the list where the downside is losing a client rather than losing time.
02
Fast working storage
Where most editors' real bottleneck lives. Ingest, cache and scrubbing get better immediately, and you feel it every single day rather than at export.
03
A display you can trust
Every colour call you make is limited by the screen you make it on. Calibration first if money is tight; a reference monitor when the work justifies it.
04
The machine
Yes, third. A Mac mini class desktop before a laptop, unless the work genuinely travels. Most people buy this first and wonder why the day feels the same.
05
Audio monitoring
Anything better than laptop speakers. Cheap to fix, and it is where amateur work gives itself away fastest.
06
The comfort layer
Keyboard, dock, chair, desk mat. Real quality of life, zero effect on output. Buy it when the four above are handled — and enjoy it then.

The honest verdict

What I’d actually tell you

Buy against your bottleneck, not against the spec sheet. The only way to find it is to look back at your last five jobs and name the moment work actually stopped. For me that was drive speed and an untrustworthy display, in that order — and for two years I was saving for a faster processor that would have fixed neither.

The reference monitor is the purchase I would make again first. Not because it makes images prettier, but because it ends the argument about whether the grade is right before the client is in it. That is worth more than any amount of raw speed.

And the keyboard will not make you a faster editor. It made eight hours a day more pleasant, which was what I bought it for and is a perfectly good reason — as long as you are honest that it is the reason. Do not let anyone, including me, sell you a comfort purchase as a productivity one.

FAQ

What should I upgrade first as a video editor?

Storage, and specifically a backup you actually trust. A slow machine costs you hours; a lost drive costs you the job, the client and the referral. Then a display you can trust. The faster computer comes third for most people, not first.

Do I need a broadcast reference monitor for freelance work?

Not to start. But it is the piece of kit that changed my colour work most, because it turns grading from a guess into a measurement. If colour is part of what you are selling, it pays for itself the first time a client stops sending “can you make it warmer” notes.

Mac mini or MacBook Pro for editing?

The mini first if your work is desk-based — you get the most performance per peso because you are not paying for a screen, battery and chassis. The laptop earns its place the moment the work genuinely travels.

Is an expensive keyboard worth it for editing?

Not as a performance upgrade — it will not render a frame faster. It is a comfort purchase and I bought it as one. Reasonable to buy if you type all day, but it belongs at the bottom of the list.

How much should I spend on my editing setup?

Work out what an hour of your time is worth, then ask how many hours a year the upgrade gives back. Buy against the bottleneck you actually hit, not the spec sheet.

Or skip the rig and hand me the footage

Podcasts, short-form, VSLs, real estate and music video — cut, graded and delivered on the setup above, by a senior editor.

Start a project →

Affiliate links on this page don't change what I recommend. Manila-based, working with clients across the US, Australia and Europe.

Discussion

Disagree? Say so.

Corrections, counter-arguments and what you are seeing in your own edit suite — all welcome. Comments run on GitHub Discussions, so sign in with a GitHub account to post. No ads, no tracking, and every thread stays public.

Studio Notes

One email a month. What we learned, before it’s obvious.

New edits and breakdowns, the AI workflows we actually run in production, and honest reads on the tools — written by an editor who still cuts every week. No daily noise, no pitching, unsubscribe in one click.

  • Retention techniques tested on real client channels
  • Automation builds you can copy — including the parts that broke
  • NLE and AI changes that actually affect your week

No spam. One email a month. Unsubscribe any time.

Need this cut for you? Start a project →