- Why kit is a business decision, not a hobby
- The machines — desk and bag
- What you look at, and the one screen I trust
- Storage, and the mistake that actually costs money
- The desk stuff that only matters after the rest
- Software: where the money goes now
- What I’d buy first on a limited budget
- The honest verdict
I have been asked about my setup enough times that it is easier to write it down. But a list of parts is a boring post and, worse, a useless one — because the interesting question was never what do you own. It is how do you decide what to buy next when money is finite, which is the position almost every freelance editor is actually in.
So this is the rig, and it is also the reasoning. Where I think a purchase was obviously right, I say so. Where I think I bought something because I wanted it rather than because I needed it, I say that too.
Why kit is a business decision, not a hobby
Here is the shift that changed how I buy things. Stop asking “can I afford this?” and start asking “how many hours a year does this give back, and what is an hour of my time worth?”
An editor billing client work has a real hourly rate, even if they have never written it down. If a purchase removes two hours a week of waiting, that is roughly a hundred hours a year. Put your own rate against that number and most sensible upgrades stop looking like spending and start looking like buying back time.
But — and this is where most gear advice fails — that logic only holds if the thing you buy addresses the bottleneck you actually hit. A faster processor does nothing if your real bottleneck is waiting on a slow drive, or redoing a grade because you could not trust your screen. Buying against the spec sheet instead of against your own week is how people end up with a fast machine and the same working day.
Think back over the last five jobs and name the moment you were waiting or redoing. Not the moment something felt slow — the moment work actually stopped. Whatever caused that is your bottleneck, and it is almost never the thing the marketing is selling you. Mine, for two years, was drive speed on ingest. It was not the CPU.
The machines — desk and bag
Two machines, doing two genuinely different jobs. If I had to keep one, it would be the desktop, and it is not close.
Mac mini M4 Pro
The most editing performance per peso I have ever bought, for one boring reason: you are not paying for a screen, a battery or a chassis. It sits under the monitors, it is silent, and it handles multicam property edits and long-form dubbing timelines without drama. If you work at a desk most days, this is the machine to buy before you consider a laptop.
MacBook Pro (M5 Pro)
This earns its place the moment work happens away from the desk — on location, at a client's office, or in an airport. It is a luxury right up until the day it isn't, and then it is the reason a deadline gets met. If your work is entirely desk-based, skip it and put the money into storage and a display.




